Staples’ “Black Men and Public Spaces” Strays Only Slightly

RuthAnn Milbert teacher Lynne Lerych May 4, 2010 English 101 Essay Review 2 Staples dark workforce and Public Spaces Strays besides S illuminately Brent Staples Black Men and Public Spaces narrative is about his realization of the vexation that black hands instill in persons of non food colouring and his attempts at f exclusively that fear. Staples essay begins him recalling a time where a bloodless woman ran from him simply because he was black.He continues to explain that his intentions werent to cause her harm but had just happened to be walking behind her since he couldnt sleep. Staples refers to generalations by Norman Podhoretz and Edward Hoagland who had denotative their views on the comparable type of fear the woman who ran from him had experienced and although the fear was factually founded it didnt give much comfort to Staples. Staples explains how black youths, generally men, were more likely intimidate people because of their upbringing and tells how this gen eralization conduct to times where he was judged by color alone and design to be a threat.After Staples realizes and begins to understand the reasons behind this fear he began fetching measures to make himself appear less threatening and by doing so he hoped to lessen the public fear of him. Staples essay definitely keeps the readers interest horizontal if passably straying from his thesis. Staples does a very nice job of retentiveness site of his chief(prenominal) topic from the title to the conclusion only deviating slightly to give more background on the reasoning behind why black men tended to use the power of intimidation starting from birth.His was objective, gave vast expert opinions, and maintained a good flow throughout the essay. His thoughts of how he could lessen the publics fear of him at the end of the essay didnt boast much evidence to prove that his ideas were effective aside from his own private experience where some people faceed to react more kindly tow ards him thusly in the past. Factors such as time passing and civil rights mother the appearance _or_ semblance just as likely to be the reason for the publics fear lessening as Staples theory on whistling.Staples Black Men and Public Spaces Strays Only SlightlyRacism has been prevalent in the United States since the first European explorers arrived at our shores. Law reforms since that time have continuously changed almost all of society however, public schooling is the context in which desegregation has reach its most salient position as a national recurrence (Foner and Garraty). America could reduce the amount of racial discrimination in our public high schools by encouraging everyone to pursue using one main tongue because it would make one less thing that fuels the racism in some people.Asking people (especially adolescents) to go out of their way to prove and make things easier for others that they may not even know might seem like an enormous indicate at first, but th e simplicity of it could maneuver positive results much faster then society has ever thought possible. Racism is generally in reaction to someones skin color or race so the way someone speaks isnt usually the focus of discussions on the matter. Lets say there was a man named, Bob. Bob was a white man from Missouri and had lost his sight over the years.One day a new mailman, a black man, cheerfully greeted Bob on his porch, but was instantly shouted at to leave the property. Although Bob was screen door at that point, the way in which the mailman spoke had told Bob he was black. Was this fair? Honestly, yes and no. No, it was wrong for Bob to be racist in the first place and shouldnt assume every human that spoke as the mailman did was a person of colors. And yes, it is a pretty fair logical implication Bob made due to the fact that the majority of people with that dialect were persons of color.If high school kids were all able to speak in the same manner as each other then the au dible canal that separates them would be greatly diminished. With that massive factor out of play, skin color becomes pretty much the sole focus of racism. If people only have one reason why they dislike or hate a group of people it weakens their resolve to continue the fight. In the Jena Six faux pas there was a massive backing of the defendants because they were lead to believe that a great civil injustice had been done. Then the truth that the defendants had been lying came to light and the fact remains that the Jena Six case climbed to its rickety position as a national attribute of racial injustice largely because a lot of people, some professional activists and many members of the press, wanted it to do so (Allen).Benjamin Dowling-Sendor, an authority on school law, is an assistant appellate defender of North Carolina in Durham has wondered if it was right that the Supreme Court rule saying prohibition of a flag that the Freedom of Speech article of the First Amendment wa s supposed to cover was justified. (SIRS) Although Dowling-Sendors issue dealt with a visual symbol the same principal can be applied to audible issues. Would the request of students speaking in a certain way violate their exemption of speech?I strongly believe that the less diverse a nation is the more stable. The quote, Unite We Stand, Divided We Fall seems to apply itself preferably well in this situation. We as individuals can remain unique, but unless we define more common ground, starting at young ages such as high school, we are doomed to another civil war.